Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Technophany
  • All Issues
  • Print-on-Demand
  • Commentaries
  • Book Reviews
  • Submission Guidelines
  • About
    • News & Announcements
    • About the Journal
    • Author Guidelines
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Team
    • Review process
    • Research Network for Philosphy and Technology
    • Privacy Statement
    • Ethics Statement and Misconduct in Publication Practices
    • Statement on the Responsible Use of Artificial Intelligence
    • Contact
  • Register
  • Login
  1. Home /
  2. Search

Search

Advanced filters
Published After
Published Before

Search Results

Found one item.
  • Scale and Sexuation Towards a Multi-Scalar (Techno)Feminism

    Luara Karlson-Carp, Geoffrey Hondroudakis
    1-42
    2024-01-05

    Technofeminism has long known that it must be a multi-scalar feminism, that is, able to think, encounter, and negotiate these increasing scales of complexity that comprise our world, from the pharmacological to the planetary-computational. We read technofeminism as constitutively defined by its commitment to both realism and anti-essentialism, and contemporary technofeminisms to be epitomised by, on the one hand, the flat vitalist ontology of new materialism, and on the other, the trans-scalar rationalism of Xenofeminism. By examining these contemporary technofeminisms through contemporary theorisations of the concept of scale, we show that they have a problem with what the latter identify as ‘scalar collapse’; these technofeminisms conceptualise the multi-scalarity of reality, in the last instance, via a collapse into either the ‘master scale’ of new materialist ‘matter’, or via the ‘trans-scalar zoom’ of Xenofeminist rationalism. As such, they recoil from the reality of scalar differences, undermining their commitment to realism (and therefore technics), as well as reducing scalar difference to one unitary, ‘metaphysical’ ground, placing them back within an essentialist collapse. Through examining contemporary theorisations of scale, we claim that in order to avoid such scalar collapse, any truly multi-scalar theory must think difference as both ontogenetic, in the Simondonian sense, and irreducibly at-least-two, in the sense of Irigaray’s concept of sexuate difference. Against any concerns that Irigaray’s notion of sexuate difference may be essentialist or determinist, we show that the ontogenetic character of this difference means it is irreducible and yet also open-ended, that is, open to multiply complex, topologically scalar transformations throughout subsequent individuations. It is this thinking of difference as this ontogenetic ‘at least two’ that can enable contemporary technofeminisms to be truly multi-scalar feminisms.

1 - 1 of 1 items

Links

Make a Submission
 
Subscribe to Newsletter 
 

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians
  • Peter Sloterdijk’s Philosophy of Technology: From Anthropogenesis to the Anthropocene
    10202
  • Affirming Entropy
    1494
  • The Physiology of Money: Containment and Circulation in the Alternative Economy
    1162
  • The Unbecoming of Being: Thermodynamics and The Metaphysics and Ethics of Entropic Decay
    960
  • When Philosophy Becomes Cybernetics and Cybernetics Becomes Philosophy: Luhmann's Systems Theory as the Foundation for Twenty-first Century Cybernetics
    905
Technophany is a journal of the Research Network for Philosophy and Technology, dedicated to the philosophical and historical studies of technologies.
E-ISSN: 2773-0875 | Privacy Statement | 
Published by Radboud University Press
Supported by Openjournals | Policy Responsible Disclosure
Supported by
Erasmus School of Philosophy and Hanart Forum

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Site Design and Modification by ein doughnut studio

 

More information about the publishing system, Platform and Workflow by OJS/PKP.