Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Technophany
  • All Issues
  • Print-on-Demand
  • Commentaries
  • Book Reviews
  • Submission Guidelines
  • About
    • News & Announcements
    • About the Journal
    • Author Guidelines
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Team
    • Review process
    • Research Network for Philosphy and Technology
    • Privacy Statement
    • Ethics Statement and Misconduct in Publication Practices
    • Statement on the Responsible Use of Artificial Intelligence
    • Contact
  • Register
  • Login
  1. Home /
  2. Search

Search

Advanced filters
Published After
Published Before

Search Results

Found one item.
  • Which Method is Cartesian? Descartes, Lacan, and the “Accumulation of Knowledge”

    Emily Laurent-Monaghan
    1-19
    2026-01-30

    Most philosophical Lacanians instinctively take Lacan’s engagement with Descartes – not to mention his explicit formulations about not only the identity of the psychoanalytic and Cartesian methods but also, moreover, that of the subject of psychoanalysis and the cogito – as comprising a crucial and unequivocal philosophical repère. Nonetheless, there is a line of thought in Lacan’s oeuvre that this orientation leaves completely unaccounted for: Lacan’s decisive point regarding knowledge as accumulation. In his recently published twelfth Seminar (Problèmes cruciaux pour la psychanalyse) from February of this year, Lacan argues that the cogito is a hinge between knowledge “in its pre-accumulative state,” to the extent that it is capable of being doubted, and knowledge as a “mode of production” which predates and even motivates capitalist accumulation. It is on this basis that we can comprehend Lacan’s seemingly conflictual or even contradictory claims that, on the one hand, Descartes inaugurates modern science by leaving the eternal truths to God (Seminar XI) and, on the other hand, that modern science forecloses truth (“Science and Truth”).

1 - 1 of 1 items

Links

Make a Submission
 
Subscribe to Newsletter 
 

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians
  • The Physiology of Money: Containment and Circulation in the Alternative Economy
    2292
  • Peter Sloterdijk’s Philosophy of Technology: From Anthropogenesis to the Anthropocene
    2000
  • Conocimientos acústicos prehispánicos mayas y su relación con la manufactura de instrumentos sonoros / Pre-Hispanic Mayan Acoustic Knowledge and its Relationship with the Manufacture of Sound Instruments
    1438
  • Art and Language After AI
    1364
  • Dialectics, Technoscience and Non-linearity: The Relevance of Hegelian Dialectics for Philosophy of Technology Now
    1282
Technophany is a journal of the Research Network for Philosophy and Technology, dedicated to the philosophical and historical studies of technologies.
E-ISSN: 2773-0875 | Privacy Statement | 
Published by Radboud University Press
Supported by Openjournals | Policy Responsible Disclosure
Supported by
Erasmus School of Philosophy and Hanart Forum

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Site Design and Modification by Allagmatic. 

 

More information about the publishing system, Platform and Workflow by OJS/PKP.