On Relational Memory through Archaeology, Technics, and Organization

Abstract

This paper conceptualizes a notion of memory based on the philosophy of archaeology, with particular emphasis on early Baltic computational mnemonic technic. Early Baltic mnemonic technic manifested as a form of memorization through gesticulations with small clay figurines, enabling the recording and retaining of larger quantities of things being counted. This interactive and material nature of memorization challenges such isolationistic ontologies as hylomorphism, suggesting that memory should not be understood as a distinct passive faculty operating solely via inner mental representations. Contrasting this definition, a relational ontology–emphasizing interactions, entanglements, and engagements–can be extended to memory. Therefore, depending on various networks of relationships, memory emerges in new and ever-changing forms of practical operations. Following this perspective, computational mnemonic technic highlight technical and organizational aspects of relational memory. These aspects are interpreted in light of Leroi-Gourhan’s theory (Gesture and Speech 1993 [1964-65]), proposing that, insofar as memory is modulated by technical determinations, it also enables the organization of anticipations for future actions.