Do Deleuze and Guattari Have an Organology?

Author(s)

  • Chantelle Gray

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54195/technophany.26687

Keywords:

geology, geophilosophy, immunology, immunological commons

Abstract

The most extensive recent work on mechanism, organicism and organology is in Yuk Hui’s Recursivity and Contingency (2019). Of interest to me is the concept of a general organology, first introduced by Georges Canguilhem to reverse the relationship between mechanism and organism by inscribing the mechanical within the organic without sacrificing a theory of technicity. More recently, the notion of an organology has been taken up by Bernard Stiegler, particularly as it relates to the exteriorisation of memory into digital artefacts. Both Canguilhem and Stiegler are discussed by Hui, and though he mentions the work of Gilles Deleuze, this is never developed in relation to organology. In this paper I ask: “Do Deleuze and Guattari have an organology?” My aim is not to critique Hui, but to supplement his work by arguing that Deleuze and Guattari do indeed have an organology, and that it is one adequate to contemporary life.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Chantelle Gray

    Chantelle Gray is a Professor in the Department of Philosophy at the University of Johannesburg, South Africa. Her research focuses on developing frameworks for taking care of humans, technologies and socio-political ecologies in the digital age. Her books include Deleuze and Anarchism (2019) and Anarchism after Deleuze and Guattari: Fabulating Futures (2022).

Downloads

Published

2026-09-22

Issue

Section

General Articles

How to Cite

Gray, Chantelle. 2026. “Do Deleuze and Guattari Have an Organology?”. Technophany, A Journal for Philosophy and Technology 2 (1): 1-20. https://doi.org/10.54195/technophany.26687.